A New Fangarian Era (Part One)
Comparison Monkeys vs.
True Inspiration
First
off, apologies for the almost two-year hiatus.
Life, the Universe and Everything intervenes as usual, but one of the
reasons came from something which occurred concerning my post focusing briefly
upon the Sixth Fanger : FANGARIUS:
The DW-RPG Chronology.
One
which brought forth something my friend, TVs Kyle from DeviantART, denotes as
the infamous Comparison Monkey. Basically, a Comparison Monkey is a critic, whom
prefers comparing/contrasting innovative art and literature with
well-established pop culture, rather than provide a genuine critique. An excellent example is claiming The Flintstones is nothing more than an
animated version of The Honeymooners, or
Yogi Bear is an ursine version of Art Carney.
Due
to the mainstreaming of the Internet, Comparison Monkeys have essentially inaugurated
the urban legend concerning illustrators, cartoonists and authors. Essentially it goes like this: our inspiration comes solely from us
sketching celebrities—actors and actresses—for creating characters. The real truth is, despite the availability
of the Internet, we don’t really do this, otherwise there would be a bear and
cavemen resembling Art Carney and Jackie
Gleason.
Or
for a more updated reference, if this was true, Brian Lee O’Malley would’ve
enigmatically drawn Michael Cera and Brandon Routh’s likenesses for Scott
Pilgrim and Todd Ingram respectively.
The
reason this misconception comes from when you start illustrating figures, the
Comparison Monkeys will always compare your characters to an actual person,
famous or otherwise. Even if you
subconsciously draw them as your basic character design.
Such
as the case when I first illustrated Fanger’s Sixth Incarnation. Even with my DW-RPG Club, the consensus has
always presumed its original source directly came from John Ritter. Except when I began working on the prototypes
for the Sixth Fanger, I wasn’t even remotely attempting on sketching Mr.
Ritter.
FANGARIAN RETROSPECTIVE: CYFANGER
– THE LOST
SIXTH Fanger PROTOTYPE
As
you recall, during my DW-RPG Club days, I had the problem of what Fanger’s next
Incarnate was going to be for the next ‘season.’ Due to the brief Terminator craze of the
mid-80s, I initially envisioned the Sixth Fanger as a cyborg. The Lost Fifth Regeneration episode did not
have the Fifth Fanger dealing with the F-Clones. Instead it was a tale where he ends up
getting captured by the Cybermen. While
being converted, his Fifth Regeneration is triggered, and he is saved by The
Doctor.
So
why the John Ritter Fanger and not CyFanger
instead? Besides considering the concept
didn’t fit within the Whoniverse, the DW-RPG members felt I had demoted Fanger
back to Companion status, since he’d briefly end up with The Doctor in several
episodes.
Instead,
the members felt since there were humanised
versions of Fanger’s relations and other Wolf-Beings, they wanted a
humanised Incarnation for the Paranormal Time Lord as well. During this complete revision of the
character, I first took the elements of the Fourth and Fifth Fanger, and closed
my eyes. Utilising my imagination, I
began sketching forth a composite image, until I acquired a basic character
design.
Afterwards,
a lone Comparison Monkey had observed the preliminary design, claiming it
greatly resembled Mr. Ritter.
One
thing I should stress here at this point:
attempting to battle against a Comparison Monkey’s like bashing your
head against a brick wall. You might
eventually get some leeway, but not before enduring severe brain damage in the
process.
Rather
than enduring such a pointless battle, I merely accepted it. As of such, I simply utilised pictures (and
during the pre-Internet days, it wasn’t exactly easy) for basic models for the
character, ensuring I obtain the correct proportions.
Afterwards,
as my art slowly evolved, so did my creative processes. Notwithstanding the origins of the Seventh
and Eighth Fanger, whenever I conjured forth supporting characters and
adversaries, I’d usually get inspiration from other people. Both famous and personal, they would become
subjects for my creations. Therefore, I’d
sketch out preliminary versions for those characters.
Contrary
what the Comparison Monkeys might inform you, I rarely just automatically
select my subjects. As with Arthur and
Excalibur, I’ll first mentally
audition the appointed subject before deciding whether they’ll fit the
character or not. Or as with most
writers, I’ll first create the character and background, then scan my
imagination upon visualizing how the characters will essentially appear.
The
Coming of the Ninth Fanger – The Prototypes
Overall,
from what you’ve learned, I do want to stress one point: when I was working on the Ninth Incarnation,
I did not simply observe Ashton Kutcher on That
70s Show, and proclaim, ‘You’re the
Ninth Fanger!’ Because as with John
Ritter and the Sixth Fanger, Mr. Kutcher was the farthest person on my mind as
a suitable candidate.
In
actuality, the Paranormal Time Lord’s next Incarnation almost came from a
galaxy far, far away. And no, I don’t
mean Barf or Lonestar from Spaceballs.
FANGER CHRISTENSEN Ix?
To
recap from the Eighth Fanger posts, in Revelations,
I privately desired on starting fresh with an entirely new
Incarnation. Nothing wrong with Jerry O’Connell,
mind you, but I realised after a prolonged hiatus, it was definitely time for a
change. Just as with the Sixth Fanger,
the same difficulty had arisen. But
rather than merely locating an inspirational model for the character, it was
more about knowing what direction the Paranormal Time Lord was going to head on
from here.
If
you remember, the challenging obstacle was the Gallifrey annihilated throwing me for a loop. Although managing on integrating the Eighth
Fanger into this concept—dealing with this loss—it became evident he was
currently in-flux upon what to do next.
Observing episodes from the Ninth and Tenth Doctor, I had formulated a
theory on how chaotic the Time Lord’s timeline had become. Whereas Fanger suspects someone (or
something) might be manipulating The Doctor’s chronological stream.
Perhaps
a possibility there was more to the Last Time War than just an embittered feud
between the Time Lords and the Daleks.
As well as Gallifrey’s untimely sacrifice. As a result, Fanger’s investigations lead him
towards the end of his Eighth self.
After
establishing the proper circumstances, the only problem now was determining the
Ninth Fanger’s appearance.
During
this time (about 2005), the hype of Revenge
of the Sith had someone suggest I use Hayden Christensen for Fanger’s next
Incarnation. However, every time I’d
envision him as the Paranormal Time Lord, all I kept receiving were Anakin and
Force jokes. The other difficulty was
Hayden emitting a somber atmosphere for the character. I felt at this juncture, because the Eighth
Fanger was already morose about Gallifrey’s destruction, the Ninth Fanger
should invoke a mixture of some humour, while also being serious at times.
Thus,
Mr. Christensen fell onto the back-burner while I continued searching my mind
upon the Ninth Fanger.
FANGER KUTCHER?
Repeating
the similar process with the Sixth Fanger, I swiftly implemented another
Composite Fanger. Beginning with the
Fourth Fanger, I subtly extracted various elements from his previous
selves. Concentrating on these elements,
I had sketched out several images, until I had produced a suitable prototype.
Being
infallible, a male Comparison Monkey noticed the image, registering its
likeness to that of Michael Kelso
from That 70s Show. As you know, Ashton Kutcher wasn’t only
famous for T7S, but his MTV show, Punk’d.
But as with John Ritter, I had never even given Mr. Kutcher a second
thought.
One
essential reason was I always had a general rule of avoiding the use of popular
icons with my characters. The components
behind this rule are as follows: (1) There’s always a slim chance the icon may
or may not like the character, and; (2) People disassociating your character with the icon’s
characters from the media. As you might
guess, this makes it extremely difficult for one to develop the character
itself.
In
short, I ended up temporarily placing the Ninth Fanger Concept into limbo. Enigmatically, Fate had other plans. Plans which might have been conceived by Rod
Serling himself from The Twilight Zone.
THAT TWILIGHT 70S BUTTERFLY SHOW
ZONE EFFECT
(OR DON’T QUESTION THE
F-CLANSCREST)
One
stormy night, while recovering from a sinus infection, I had been watching That 70s Show on FX. Strangeness materialised in the form of
Michael Kelso wearing a shirt and sweater combo similar to the Fourth Fanger’s. Inexplicably, I noticed Fanger’s crimson
F-Clanscrest faintly materialise upon Kelso’s chest.
I
adamantly refused the phantom suggestion, because I wasn’t too keen on a ‘Kelso’ Fanger (besides I sorta had that
with the Second Fanger). Yet, the
Clanscrest fiercely illuminated itself until the old television screen (pre-flat
HD era) suddenly popped out and went blank.
Fearing lightning had shorted out the set, I immediately went over to
the television.
Approaching
it, the screen instantly sprang back to life.
Except it was now tuned on Cinemax, revealing The Butterfly Effect. The
scene it demonstrated was Evan discovering himself within an asylum after
attempting another time-altering trip (perhaps he should’ve gotten some advice
from The Doctor, eh?), and he desperately searches for his journals and films
to alter Time again. Though the scene
was short, the television popped again, reverting back to That 70s Show.
After
the bizarre occurrence, I ended up chatting with a friend online who worked for
Cinemax. He inquired if I have been
experiencing any problems the night before.
Apparently the company’s Texas servers had endured a mysterious power
surge. Scrambling the scheduling
program, the result caused some subscribers receiving anomalous films and shows
not programmed for the night. When I had
informed him about my Butterfly Effect
experience, he considered the event ultimately weird, if not suspicious.
For
you see, despite the fact HBO/Cinemax receiving the cable distribution rights, The Butterfly Effect was not scheduled
for broadcast until the next month.
Overlooking
the Twilight Zonesque nature of the
situation, I acquired two important lessons that night. One happened to be Ashton Kutcher’s portrayal
of Evan Treborn. The other was the
realisation I had caught myself performing the worst crime which Comparison
Monkeys commonly instigate: associating
actors with their characters.
In
short, Barry Williams is NOT Greg
Brady; David Cassidy is NOT Keith
Partridge and; Ashton Kutcher is NOT Michael
Kelso. Meaning the Clanscrest indicated
Ashton Kutcher would be right for the role, and not his character counterpart.
Confirming
this, I started watching him in other roles, acknowledging his versatile
abilities and his resourcefulness. Envisioning him in an initial costume, before
I grasped the situation, Mr. Kutcher ended up being the basis for the Ninth
Fanger.